IT Intel/Compare

IT Intel · AI-generated enterprise IT comparisons · Refreshed daily

← Back to IT Intel Privacy Policy

RoCE vs iWARP | IT Intel | IT Intel

Compare/Storage Protocols/roce vs iwarp

Storage Protocols

RoCE vs iWARP

This comparison covers the performance, cost, and features of RoCE and iWARP storage protocols

Updated June 23, 2026

Score Breakdown

RoCE

Pick

Performance

9

Cost value

5

Features

8

Maturity

7

Total: 29 / 40

iWARP

Performance

8

Cost value

6

Features

7

Maturity

8

Total: 29 / 40

Strengths & Weaknesses

RoCE

High performance

Low latency

Higher cost

Complexity in setup

iWARP

Maturity and stability

Wide support and adoption

Performance limitations

Limited scalability

When to Choose

RoCE

Best when high-performance and low-latency storage is required

iWARP

Best when stability, support, and wide adoption are crucial

IT Intel Verdict

Pick: RoCE

IT Intel suggests RoCE for its high performance and low latency, making it suitable for demanding workloads, while iWARP is a better choice for environments prioritizing stability, support, and wide adoption.

More Storage Protocols comparisons

NVMe-oF vs Fibre Channel iSCSI vs NFS SMB 3.0 vs NFSv4