Palo Alto Networks Prisma vs Check Point CloudGuard

This comparison covers the cloud security posture management capabilities of Palo Alto Networks Prisma and Check Point CloudGuard

Updated July 1, 2026

Score Breakdown

Palo Alto Networks Prisma

Pick

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 33 / 40

Check Point CloudGuard

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 32 / 40

Strengths & Weaknesses

Palo Alto Networks Prisma

Comprehensive cloud security features

Integration with Palo Alto firewalls

Advanced threat detection

Complex pricing model

Resource-intensive deployment

Check Point CloudGuard

Scalable and flexible architecture

Easy to deploy and manage

Cost-effective

Less mature than Prisma

Limited support for multi-cloud environments

When to Choose

Palo Alto Networks Prisma

Best when comprehensive cloud security features and integration with Palo Alto firewalls are required

Check Point CloudGuard

Best when scalability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness are prioritized

IT Intel Verdict

Pick: Palo Alto Networks Prisma

Palo Alto Networks Prisma is the top choice for organizations requiring comprehensive cloud security features and integration with Palo Alto firewalls, while Check Point CloudGuard is more suitable for smaller organizations prioritizing scalability and cost-effectiveness

Try it out

Palo Alto Networks

Request a demo

Get demo

Affiliate links — IT Intel may earn a commission at no cost to you.

More Security Platforms comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SentinelOne Singularity Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security