Cisco Catalyst 9300 vs Aruba CX 6400

Comparison of two leading enterprise network switches

Updated July 1, 2026

Score Breakdown

Cisco Catalyst 9300

Pick

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 33 / 40

Aruba CX 6400

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 32 / 40

Strengths & Weaknesses

Cisco Catalyst 9300

Highly scalable

Robust security features

Wide range of deployment options

Complex configuration

High power consumption

Aruba CX 6400

Simplified network management

AI-powered troubleshooting

Competitive pricing

Limited scalability

Less extensive security features

When to Choose

Cisco Catalyst 9300

Best when scalability and security are top priorities

Aruba CX 6400

Best when simplicity and cost-effectiveness are key

IT Intel Verdict

Pick: Cisco Catalyst 9300

While both switches excel in their own right, the Cisco Catalyst 9300 stands out for its exceptional scalability and security features, making it the top choice for large-scale enterprise deployments. However, the Aruba CX 6400 is a strong contender for smaller organizations seeking a more affordable and user-friendly solution.

Try it out

Cisco

Free learning labs

Explore free

Affiliate links — IT Intel may earn a commission at no cost to you.

More Networking Vendors comparisons

Juniper Mist vs Cisco DNA Center Aruba Instant On vs Ubiquiti UniFi Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall