PostgreSQL vs MySQL

This comparison covers the performance, cost, and features of relational databases PostgreSQL and MySQL

Updated June 23, 2026

Score Breakdown

PostgreSQL

Pick

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 36 / 40

MySQL

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 31 / 40

Strengths & Weaknesses

PostgreSQL

Advanced features like window functions and common table expressions

Robust support for concurrent transactions

Extensive support for data types

Steeper learning curve

Limited support for some NoSQL features

MySQL

Wide community support

Easy to use

Support for a wide range of storage engines

Limited support for advanced features

Not as robust as PostgreSQL for concurrent transactions

When to Choose

PostgreSQL

Best when requiring advanced relational database features and support for concurrent transactions

MySQL

Best when developing web applications with simple database requirements and a wide community of support

IT Intel Verdict

Pick: PostgreSQL

IT Intel recommends PostgreSQL for its advanced features, robust support for concurrent transactions, and extensive support for data types, making it a great choice for complex relational database use cases.

Try it out

Neon (Serverless Postgres)

Generous free tier

Start free

PlanetScale

Free hobby plan

Start free

Affiliate links — IT Intel may earn a commission at no cost to you.

More Databases comparisons

MongoDB vs Cassandra Redis vs Memcached CockroachDB vs Amazon Aurora