Oracle Database vs Microsoft SQL Server

Comparison of popular enterprise relational databases for large-scale applications

Updated June 26, 2026

Score Breakdown

Oracle Database

Pick

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 29 / 40

Microsoft SQL Server

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 29 / 40

Strengths & Weaknesses

Oracle Database

Advanced security features

Highly scalable and reliable

Comprehensive set of features

High cost

Complex to manage and maintain

Microsoft SQL Server

Tight integration with Microsoft ecosystem

Easy to use and manage

Cost-effective compared to Oracle

Limited support for non-Windows platforms

Less scalable than Oracle

When to Choose

Oracle Database

Best when requiring a highly scalable, reliable, and secure enterprise database with advanced features

Microsoft SQL Server

Best when already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem and seeking a cost-effective, easy-to-use database solution

IT Intel Verdict

Pick: Oracle Database

While Microsoft SQL Server offers a more cost-effective solution with tight integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, Oracle Database's advanced security features, scalability, and comprehensive set of features make it the top choice for large-scale, enterprise applications. Although Oracle's high cost is a significant drawback, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses, earning it the top spot in this comparison.

More Databases comparisons

MongoDB vs PostgreSQL MySQL vs MariaDB Cassandra vs Couchbase