Red Hat OpenShift vs Google Anthos

This comparison evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of Red Hat OpenShift and Google Anthos in the container orchestration and management space

Updated June 25, 2026

Score Breakdown

Red Hat OpenShift

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 31 / 40

Google Anthos

Pick

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 31 / 40

Strengths & Weaknesses

Red Hat OpenShift

Tight integration with Red Hat Enterprise Linux

Robust security features

Wide range of supported platforms

Complex and expensive to deploy and manage

Limited support for non-Red Hat platforms

Google Anthos

Seamless integration with Google Cloud Platform

Advanced AI/ML capabilities

Highly scalable and performant

Limited support for on-premises deployments

Requires significant investment in Google Cloud Platform

When to Choose

Red Hat OpenShift

Best when you need a robust and secure container orchestration platform with tight Red Hat integration

Google Anthos

Best when you need a highly scalable and performant container orchestration platform with advanced AI/ML capabilities and tight Google Cloud integration

IT Intel Verdict

Pick: Google Anthos

Google Anthos is the winner in this comparison due to its high performance, scalability, and advanced AI/ML capabilities, making it the ideal choice for large-scale, cloud-native deployments. However, Red Hat OpenShift remains a viable option for those invested in the Red Hat ecosystem and requiring robust security features.

More Containers & Orchestration comparisons

Kubernetes vs Docker Swarm Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Rancher vs VMware Tanzu