AWS S3 vs Google Cloud Storage

This comparison covers the object storage services offered by AWS and Google Cloud

Updated June 27, 2026

Score Breakdown

AWS S3

Pick

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 32 / 40

Google Cloud Storage

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 30 / 40

Strengths & Weaknesses

AWS S3

Highly durable and scalable

Wide range of storage classes

Tight integration with AWS services

Complex pricing model

Limited support for some non-AWS services

Google Cloud Storage

Ease of use

Automatic scaling

Support for Cloud Datastore

Less mature than AWS S3

Limited support for some AWS services

When to Choose

AWS S3

Best when you need a highly durable and scalable object storage service with tight integration with AWS services

Google Cloud Storage

Best when you need a simple, easy-to-use object storage service with automatic scaling

IT Intel Verdict

Pick: AWS S3

AWS S3 is the more mature and feature-rich object storage service, with a strong focus on durability and scalability. However, Google Cloud Storage offers a more straightforward and user-friendly experience, with automatic scaling and support for Cloud Datastore. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on your specific needs and existing infrastructure.

Try it out

AWS

12-month free tier

Try free

Google Cloud

$300 free credit

Try free

Affiliate links — IT Intel may earn a commission at no cost to you.

More Cloud Providers comparisons

AWS Lambda vs Google Cloud Functions Microsoft Azure vs IBM Cloud Oracle Cloud Infrastructure vs Alibaba Cloud