Azure Backup vs AWS Backup

Side‑by‑side look at the two native public‑cloud backup services, focusing on integration depth, cost, and feature parity in 2026.

Updated November 5, 2026

Score Breakdown

Azure Backup

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 32 / 40

AWS Backup

Pick

Performance

Cost value

Features

Maturity

Total: 33 / 40

Strengths & Weaknesses

Azure Backup

Tight integration with Windows Server and Azure Site Recovery

Predictable per‑GB pricing with tiered hot/cold options

Strong RBAC and Azure Policy compliance tooling

Limited native support for non‑Microsoft workloads (e.g., Oracle)

Feature set lags behind AWS for advanced data‑lifecycle automation

Backup UI can be unintuitive for multi‑account setups

AWS Backup

Broad coverage across AWS services (EFS, RDS, DynamoDB, etc.)

High performance through native S3 Glacier Deep Archive

Cross‑region automated copy and backup vaults

Cost can spike for frequent restores from Glacier Deep Archive

Complex pricing model for cross‑region replication

Less granular role‑based access compared with Azure AD

When to Choose

Azure Backup

Best for organizations heavily invested in Microsoft ecosystems and needing integrated disaster‑recovery with Azure Site Recovery.

AWS Backup

Best for AWS‑centric workloads that require the widest service coverage and ultra‑low‑latency restores.

IT Intelligence Verdict

Pick: AWS Backup

AWS Backup edges ahead on breadth of service coverage and raw performance, but Azure Backup remains the more cost‑effective and compliant choice for Microsoft‑centric shops.

Try it out

Microsoft Azure

$200 free credit

Try free

AWS

12-month free tier

Try free

Affiliate links — IT Intelligence may earn a commission at no cost to you.